Grading Texas

Clay Robison’s report card on education and the Texas political arena

The IDEA charter chain, which is seeking state approval to
add 27 campuses in Texas and increase its enrollment cap by almost 35,000
students, already takes a huge chunk of tax dollars from the public education
budget -- $498 million for 2019-20 alone. By comparison, that is more tax money
than the Legislature appropriated to the University of Texas at Austin that
year.

IDEA’s proposed expansion, as reported by the Houston Chronicle,
would be the largest in the history of charters in Texas and would take millions
of additional tax dollars from under-funded public schools.

The charter chain calls itself IDEA Public Schools, but it
doesn’t operate like public schools. As do other corporate charter chains, it
has a non-elected board unanswerable to taxpayers. Real public schools have
elected governing boards whose members, unlike IDEA’s, live where their schools
are located.

IDEA can selectively pick students. If it can’t accommodate every
student who applies for one of its campuses, it creates waiting lists. Real
public schools have to accept every child who lives in the district. They don’t
have waiting lists. Instead, they seek class size waivers or haul in more
portable classrooms.

In reality, IDEA Public Schools operate like private
schools. They are public only in the sense that they get tax dollars. IDEA
recruits aggressively because every enrollee brings more tax dollars at the
expense of the district the charter chain has invaded.

IDEA had about 49,500 students at 92 campuses in Texas last
year. Its current enrollment cap is 63,200, and it wants to increase that to
97,985.

The decision is up to Education Commissioner Mike Morath,
who in past years has given IDEA pretty much what it has wanted. But he has slowed
down this request, apparently because of publicity highlighting how IDEA is
different from real public schools in other ways as well.

Real public schools don’t lease private jets. But IDEA was
all set last year to enter a $15 million, eight-year lease on a private jet for
company executives until unwanted publicity killed the deal. Private donors
reportedly were going to pay for the high-flying comfort, but private donations
to charter schools should be spent to educate students, not pamper
administrators.

Real public schools don’t lease luxury boxes for NBA games
either. But IDEA used to have one, a box and tickets costing $400,000 a year
for San Antonio Spurs games. Publicity killed that one too.

The chain’s then-CEO Tom Torkelson, who admitted those were
some “really dumb” ideas, soon resigned from the charter company he had helped
found, leaving with a $900,000 payout.

In a letter, TEA told IDEA that some people may consider the
above spending “questionable” and cited other administrative issues that “might
be indicative of inadequate financial oversight” – issues such as owing the
Teacher Retirement System $130,000 and repeatedly failing to meet reporting
deadlines for grant money.

IDEA has responded, claiming it has taken steps to clean up
its act. But TSTA is urging Morath to reject the expansion request. With a
pandemic and economic downturn slashing billions of dollars from state revenue
and tightening under-funded school budgets, this is no time to be giving a
corporate charter chain like IDEA more opportunities to snag tax dollars.

The total UT-Austin budget for 2019-20, by the way, was $3.3
billion, but only $374 million of that was state general tax revenue, compared
to $498 million in tax money that the IDEA chain received. UT-Austin received
much more revenue, $674 million, from tuition.

Clay Robison

In the dangerous rush to get teachers and students back into
classrooms prematurely, pages upon pages of health and safety guidelines and
protocols have been written by school districts and colleges to reassure
educators and parents. But as long as the pandemic continues to pose a deadly
threat, even scientifically and medically based guidelines aren’t enough to
bolster confidence.

A faculty member at Texas State University in San Marcos,
which reopened this week, explained why.

“I feel like all the school reopening plans are based on
models of idealized human behavior as opposed to real human behavior. They’re
predicated on the assumption that people will follow the rules,” Nicole Taylor,
associate professor of anthropology, told The Texas Tribune.

How rash is that assumption? Let us recite but a few examples.

Several prominent universities in other states opened and
were soon forced to reclose their doors after many students made it clear they
were more interested in partying than social distancing. Unfortunately, it’s
not just students.

In Texas, Gov. Abbott’s mask-wearing order is being widely
ignored by people of all ages. Some sheriffs have even openly refused to
enforce it, and the governor is seemingly powerless to do anything about it.

A few months ago, you may remember, a couple of state
legislators, for selfish, political reasons, got haircuts in open, political
defiance of Abbott’s order that had temporarily closed barber shops and hair
salons. They skated untouched, but a hair salon owner in Dallas reopened
prematurely and got put in jail – until Abbott quickly caved in and the Texas
Supreme Court ordered her release.

Now, that same hair salon owner plans to use her overnight
fame as a rule-breaker to run for the state Senate and may get elected.

At least one school superintendent in Texas has told parents
concerned about the safety of their children that he didn’t “believe” in masks.
He refused to wear one during a meeting and said he would let school employees
and students decide whether to wear them, despite the governor’s order.

Refusing to wear a mask has become a political badge of
“honor” for Texans who are happy to risk our country’s future with four more
years of a President Trump while all but ignoring a deadly disease, as Trump
has mostly done.

To make matters worse, some school districts and
universities are relying on students and employees to voluntarily self-screen
for COVID-19 symptoms before they come to campus. This “trust me” loophole is
huge.

Schools and universities can – and should -- publish
guidelines and protocols about masks, social distancing and hand-washing. But
human behavior is critical, and many educators aren’t willing to bet their
lives on that.

Clay Robison

Despite President Trump’s war against the U.S. Postal Service, his reelection campaign chose that form of delivery to mistakenly send my wife a “Keep America Great” fund-raising appeal. I intercepted it before she had a chance to trash it because I wanted to see what was on the president’s mind, other than reelection and, of course, the education of America’s children. After all, how do you keep America great without supporting a strong public education system?

Turns out the letter and an enclosed survey, addressed to “Patriotic Conservative,” said not a word about the education of America’s children. The president had other priorities to trumpet. Like attacking the World Health Organization, China and Planned Parenthood. Like lying about the “fraud and abuse” in voting-by-mail and the “dangerous caravans” of refugees at the Mexican border.

He also wanted to know what Patriotic Conservative thought about designating Antifa as a terrorist organization and whether President Trump’s performance in office had lived up to his/her expectations.

And then there was this question, “In your opinion, has the media been truthful in its reporting on President Trump?” (The presidential skin is still thin.)

Trump also lied in his letter about “moving swiftly to revive the American economy while battling a once-in-a-century pandemic unleashed by the Communist Chinese.” The Chinese didn’t unleash it, and Trump has spent more time ignoring and downplaying the severity of the coronavirus than he has trying to fight it.

Once the coronavirus is brought under control, with little thanks to Trump, education will be key to reviving the American economy, and Trump didn’t address education at all in his fund-raising appeal. He didn’t because his only interest in education is privatizing public schools and, now that his reelection campaign is struggling, using students and educators as political props in a dangerous charade to fool voters into thinking the country is returning to normal.

The reopening of schools is essential to that charade, and that is why Trump is pressuring governors and school districts around the country to open prematurely for in-person instruction while thousands of Americans are still being infected and dying from COVID-19.

Many schools around the country have reopened and then soon shut down again with the discovery of infections that were endangering the health of students, educators and their families. But Trump persists.

How many educators and students do we want to see sacrificed? The answer is zero.

Clay Robison

Another important report on problems with charter schools has been released, although attention to it has been diverted by the continuing controversy over reopening schools during a deadly pandemic.

This study by the Network for Public Education found that more than one-fourth of the charter schools that opened around the country between 1999 and 2017 had closed after operating for only five years and about half had closed after 15 years, displacing more than 867,000 students.

As reported in the Washington Post, the study, which drew on information from the U.S. Department of Education, also found that in three of the poorest cities in the country – Detroit, Tucson and Milwaukee – more charters closed in areas with higher rates of poverty than in areas with less poverty.

An earlier study by the same organization, a nonprofit co-founded by public education activist Diane Ravitch, found that the federal government had wasted as much as $1 billion on charters that had never opened or opened and then closed because of mismanagement and other reasons.

Remember, charters receive tax dollars but are operated like private schools, with boards that are unaccountable to the public and may not even be located in the same state as the schools they control. Overall, in terms of academic performance, charters are no better than traditional public schools, and many are much worse.

The Network for Public Education also has determined that the federal government’s regulation of public spending on charters has been lax and that the state with the most charters to receive federal funding but never open is Michigan, home to Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, who promotes charters as part of her school privatization agenda.

In Texas, charters received almost $3 billion in state revenue in 2019, and much of that went to charters operated by for-profit management organizations. Every tax dollar they receive is a state tax dollar taken away from an under-funded, neighborhood public school. And those under-funded public schools are where the vast majority of Texas school children will continue to be educated, including during health crises, such as this one, which stretch school budgets even thinner.

Not surprisingly, the new report concluded that this is no time to continue spending tax dollars on new charters.

“Federal, state and local governments should implement a moratorium on the opening of new charter schools,” the report said. “The high odds of charter school failure, combined with the fiscal constraints we face due to an economic downturn and the novel coronavirus pandemic, mean it is too risky for tax dollars to continue to flow into the charter sector.”

New report finds high closure rates for charter schools over time

Clay Robison