Skip to content Skip to left sidebar Skip to right sidebar Skip to footer

Grading Texas

Jimmy Kimmel and educators have something very important in common

Late night TV host Jimmy Kimmel operates in a different world than schoolteachers and most university faculty, and his earnings dwarf theirs, but the TV star has something very important in common with the educators. They are all on the front lines of protecting democracy, and that makes them political targets in this age of the aspiring dictator, Donald Trump, and his gang of apologists and enablers.

Trump and many of his elected followers keep attacking what autocrats hate and Kimmel and educators represent — things like the First Amendment, real freedom of speech, truth and inclusion.

Trump has made it clear that, in his view, free speech doesn’t include speech or media reports that are critical of him and doesn’t include educational policies or classroom discussions with which he takes issue.

Months ago, he bullied two TV networks — CBS and Kimmel’s ABC — into settling lawsuits he brought over alleged grievances that should have been thrown out of court. Brendan Carr, Trump’s chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, then strong armed ABC into temporarily pulling Kimmel’s show off the air.

Trump also has withheld funds appropriated by Congress from several, elite universities to force them into dropping diversity, equity and inclusion programs that offend the racists and bigots among his political base and his own personal sense of superiority.

The anti-First Amendment infection has spread to Texas, where Gov. Greg Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and Trump’s legislative supporters in Texas have clamped down on what public school teachers can teach their students in our state. This began a few years ago with restrictions on teaching about slavery and race relations, followed this year with a ban on teaching about diversity, equity and inclusion.

Texas leaders also have imposed restrictions on books in school libraries.

A few weeks ago, politics also figured in the firings of two higher education faculty members in Texas. One was a Texas A&M instructor who was axed for allegedly teaching material that was not part of the course catalogue description for her class in children’s literature.

In truth, she was fired for discussing DEI material with a class and being caught on a student’s video. Abbott demanded she be fired for violating state law, even though, unlike the DEI ban in K-12 public schools, there is no state law prohibiting professors from discussing DEI in higher education classes. Under MAGA-inspired political pressure, though, the A&M president fired the professor and then resigned from his own job a few days later.

Now, Angelo State University, citing a legally dubious executive order from Trump, is banning discussions of transgender issues in its classrooms.

A Texas State University professor was fired for allegedly inciting a violent overthrow of our government. He was axed after a video of him speaking at a socialist conference about anarchists and their lack of organization was posted on social media. “Without organization, how can anyone expect to overthrow the most bloodthirsty, profit-driven, mad organization in the history of the world — that of the United States?” he reportedly said.

I don’t know if he really was promoting violence — most professors in Texas don’t — or merely trying to make an academic, hypothetical point, a risky endeavor nevertheless for educators in an era when unfriendly digital eyes and ears are lurking everywhere. In any event, he didn’t make the remarks in a classroom, and he is entitled to due process.

The former professor, who had tenure, has sued the university, claiming violation of his free speech and due process rights as well as his contractual provisions.

“Conduct that advocates for inciting violence is directly contrary to the values of Texas State University,” the university’s president said after reviewing the video. “I cannot and will not tolerate such behavior.”

The only violent attempt to overthrow the U.S. government since the Civil War was the Jan. 6, 2021, deadly attack on the Capitol by rioters stirred up by Trump’s claim that the 2020 election, which he lost, had been stolen from him. The rioters delayed but didn’t stop Congress’ certification of the election results favoring Democrat Joe Biden.

Despite numerous court decisions upholding Biden’s election, Trump still wrongly claims the election was stolen. On his first day back in office in January, he pardoned everyone who had been convicted of participating in the riot, including those who had been convicted of assaulting Capitol police officers.

Inciting violent conduct may be contrary to the values of Texas State University and, I hope, to most Texans. But what are the values of a president who is a threat to democracy?

Clay Robison

You think STAAR testing is bad? Just wait. The legislative majority is about to enact a bill to make it worse

All the students, parents, teachers and school administrators who hate the STAAR test – and that would be most of you – are about to get an unwanted surprise from the Legislature, a replacement test that promises to be even worse.

Yes, the Republican majority that controls our state’s lawmaking body goes through the motions of listening to a ton of complaints about the unhealthy student stress from high stakes testing, the costly waste of classroom time teaching to the test and the discriminatory impact on disadvantaged kids and English language learners and then ignores all those concerns.

The result is House Bill 8, which is expected to receive final legislative approval before this second special session ends. It provides for a new school testing/accountability system that will increase – not decrease — the number of standardized tests students will have to take each year. One test will be added at the beginning of the school year and another during the middle of the year in addition to testing at the end of the year.

The new accountability system will be largely designed and created under the control of an unelected, test-happy education commissioner. Teachers, whose future careers can depend on their students’ test scores, will have little input into designing the new system. Only one classroom teacher will be included on a new accountability advisory committee.

The new testing will debut in the 2027-28 school year. Republicans in the Texas House and Senate have voted for it, and most Democrats voted against it.

Here are some other problems with the new testing/accountability system:

  • A-F accountability ratings of K-8 schools will continue to be based solely on high stakes tests. The measure fails to provide other quality indicators – such as enrichment programs, career and technical education or the provision of full-day pre-kindergarten programs – as alternatives to testing. Federal law allows these alternatives.
  • The new law could result in the addition of another quality indicator based on test scores to be considered as a factor in a school’s or district’s accountability rating. It would be student progress during a school year measured between the first and third testing periods.
  • The law will permit the education commissioner to change the standards for accountability indicators every year, creating a constantly moving target for school districts.
  • It will limit an independent school district’s ability to challenge a state accountability rating it considers inaccurate or unfair, but charter schools would not be subject to that restriction.
  • The measure will allow the education commissioner to order a school district to enter an 1882 partnership with a charter school to seek educational improvements for a struggling campus as an alternative to sanctions. Such charter partnerships already are an option, but it is unacceptable for the state to order a district into a charter partnership, robbing district voters of local control. Besides, many of those charter partnerships have failed, despite costing taxpayers and school districts hundreds of millions of dollars.

Under the STAAR testing system, some school districts already administer progress monitoring exams earlier in the school year, but they are not required to. HB 8 will make the tests at the beginning and middle of the school year mandatory. The state will pay for these extra tests but only if they are developed by the education commissioner, who may choose to align them with the Bible-infused Bluebonnet curriculum that districts are already receiving financial incentives to adopt.

I am sure they will find another name for it, but we may as well call the new testing regime STAAR II or Mega-Migraine.

Clay Robison