Skip to contentSkip to left sidebar Skip to right sidebar Skip to footer

Grading Texas

Yes, folks, class size does matter

 

It is partly common sense, which was lost on the education budget cutters in the Legislature a few years ago. Now, there is additional academic affirmation of what should be obvious. Class size does matter, and the smaller the better.

Research shows that children learn more and teachers are more effective in smaller classes, concludes a new policy brief by the National Education Policy Center. And, it notes, smaller classes are even more critical for low-income and minority children, who now account for more than half of Texas’ public school enrollment.

“Any increases in class size will likely be most harmful to these populations,” the author, Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach of Northwestern University, writes.

She also points out, “The per-pupil impact is reasonably stable across class-size reductions of different sizes and from different baseline class sizes.” In other words, always think smaller, not larger.

In case your memory needs refreshing, members of the legislative majority in 2011 – driven more by ideology than common sense or the needs of school children — pooh-poohed previous academic studies generally pointing out the same thing. They slashed $5.4 billion from public school budgets, left several billion dollars of taxpayers’ money in the bank and forced school districts to seek thousands of waivers for overcrowded elementary school classrooms.

The budget-cutters argued that there was nothing “magical” about Texas’ 22-1 student-teacher ratio for K-4, which they forced districts to violate. Magic, though, has nothing to do with it. It’s a matter of keeping class sizes at a small enough level to allow teachers to give students the individual attention they need to succeed. Based on her report, Schanzenbach likely would agree that 15-1 would be better, but she also would point out that 22-1 certainly is better than the levels to which many classrooms swelled after the budget cuts.

Many classes are still too crowded as districts continue to operate under an inadequate and unfair school funding system. And, the ultimate victims are children.

“Class size is an important determinant of student outcomes and one that can be directly influenced by policy,” Schanzenbach writes. “All else being equal, increasing class sizes will harm student outcomes.”

She added: “The evidence suggests that increasing class size will harm not only children’s test scores in the short run but also their long-term human capital formation. Money saved today by increasing class sizes will be offset by more substantial social and educational costs in the future.”

If only members of the legislative majority could grasp the reality that Texas’ future won’t end with the next Republican primary.

http://www.greatlakescenter.org/docs/Policy_Briefs/Schanzenbach_ClassSize.pdf

 

School vouchers – a bad idea that refuses to die

 

Some bad ideas just won’t go away, and stealing tax dollars from public schools to pay for private school vouchers is one of them. Voucher legislation failed – again – in the Texas Legislature last session, although lawmakers did expand opportunities for private charter school operators to dip into the state treasury.

Fortunately, the Texas Legislature isn’t in session this year, but many other legislatures around the country are, and voucher proponents are knocking on the doors in several of them, according to a roundup published in Education Week.

Bills to either create or expand state voucher programs have been filed in Alaska, Indiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Wisconsin. And, U.S. Sens. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and Tim Scott of South Carolina have filed legislation in Washington to convert several federal education assistance programs into vouchers that would allow students to take federal tax dollars to private schools.

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence has called for a further expansion of that state’s voucher program, which already has doubled in size since it started in 2011. It now diverts tax dollars to 19,800 students. Far more interesting than the governor’s proposal, however, is a recent State of Indiana report that shows what kind of students actually are using vouchers.

Remember all the claims, at least in Texas, that vouchers are mainly intended to help low-income, disadvantaged students escape from “failing” neighborhood schools? We will hear the same claims next year, accompanied by a large volume of crocodile tears.

In any event, according to the official Indiana report, 40 percent of the students receiving vouchers in Indiana during the current school year never attended a public school in that state. So, do voucher advocates really care who the students are? What were these kids “escaping” from?

The Indiana report reconfirms my long-held suspicions that the voucher movement is largely a privatization raid on public schools intended more to benefit private school owners than school children. Depending on eligibility requirements, they also can give families of above-average wealth a break—at taxpayers’ expense — on their kids’ private school tuition.

Abbott needs to support South Texas schools, not insult its residents

 

A very well-written editorial in the McAllen Monitor takes strong exception to Greg Abbott’s remarks that indirectly, but deliberately and inaccurately, painted the border area of South Texas as “third world.” It is linked below and well-worth reading.

South Texas isn’t “third world.” But it has had all it can take from the patronizing attitudes of public officials, such as Abbott, who purport to want South Texans’ votes yet continue to squash the single most important economic development tool the region has – its public education system.

Don’t forget that Abbott is the state attorney general who continues to defend the state’s under-funded and unfair school finance system, including $5.4 billion in budget cuts that continue to hit many South Texas school districts extremely hard.

Families in the Valley raise their children in the same wealthy state that is responsible for educating children from families in Highland Park in Dallas and River Oaks in Houston. We all want the same things for our children – good schools, good jobs and an opportunity to succeed. We’re all Texans, and we need leaders who are more interested in educating our children than using terms like “third world” to characterize any area of our state.

http://www.themonitor.com/opinion/the_monitor_view/article_135beb94-8f83-11e3-81fc-0017a43b2370.html

KIPP became too expensive for one school district

 

The absurdity of expanding charter schools in Texas while under-funding school districts has come to a head in Galveston, where Galveston ISD and the KIPP charter chain are severing ties. The reason, according to the Houston Chronicle, is that the school district can no longer afford KIPP.

Under a contract with the district, KIPP has been operating two campuses in Galveston ISD with about 900 students combined. The district this year paid KIPP $5.5 million for the two schools, about $1.5 million more than it would have spent on those students if they had been attending traditional, district-run schools. That means the district has been spending about $1,600 less per year for each student not enrolled in KIPP, which is most Galveston ISD students.

The KIPP schools will finish this school year but reopen in August as regular Galveston ISD campuses.

“It became kind of an equity issue,” Galveston Superintendent Larry Nichols told the Chronicle. “I’m a fan of KIPP, but we’ve got to live within the budget.”

KIPP schools have a longer school day and year, but they were taking money away from most of the district’s enrollment, children whose parents proportionately pay the same taxes as KIPP parents.

Galveston and hundreds of other school districts are still feeling the effects of the $5.4 billion in school budget cuts that the legislative majority imposed in 2011, because lawmakers restored only part of the funding last year. And, instead of holding the line on charter schools, the legislative majority raised the ceiling on an expensive experiment.