Skip to content Skip to left sidebar Skip to right sidebar Skip to footer

Grading Texas

Who voted for Senate Bill 8?

Rep. Sylvester Turner, DHouston, one of the strongest supporters of public school teachers during both the regular and special legislative sessions, offered some interesting statistics during final debate on Senate Bill 8, the antiteacher bill that legislators sent to the governor earlier this week.

Texas, he pointed out, has approximately 1,030 public school superintendents and more than 300,000 public school teachers. Yet, the House was getting ready to pass Senate Bill 8, which was requested by superintendents to allow them to cut teacher pay and weaken teacher employment rights.

Approved 8063, Senate Bill 8 adds injury to injury for teachers and school kids, coming on top of a state budget that slashes more than $5 billion from public education over the next two years.

Most House members either thought teachers would overlook or forgive their votes. Or, maybe some legislators simply can’t count.

If ever there was a time for teachers to be actively involved in politics, this is it. The budget cuts and Senate Bill 8 were political decisions, and the political calculus in Austin (antigovernment, antipublic schools) must be changed.

Between now and the March primary elections, TSTA will be sending its members a lot of information about officeholders and candidates we believe are supportive of teachers and public schools and those who aren’t.

For starters, here is a list of the House members who voted for the final version of Senate Bill 8, the antiteacher bill. Check to see if your state representative is on the list and remember his or her name. When they campaign for reelection next year as proteacher candidates (and they will), don’t believe them.

The proSenate Bill 8 voters (all Republicans) are:

Jose Aliseda of Beeville, Charles “Doc” Anderson of Waco, Rodney Anderson of Plano, Jimmie Don Aycock of Killeen, Marva Beck of Centerville, Leo Berman of Tyler, Dennis Bonnen of Angleton, Dan Branch of Dallas, Cindy Burkett of Mesquite, Angie Chen Button of Richardson, Erwin Cain of Como, Bill Callegari of Houston, Warren Chisum of Pampa, Wayne Christian of Nacogdoches, Byron Cook of Corsicana, Tom Craddick of Midland, Brandon Creighton of Conroe, Myra Crownover of Lake Dallas, John Davis of Houston, Sarah Davis of Houston.

Also, Rob Eissler of The Woodlands, Gary Elkins of Houston, Allen Fletcher of Tomball, Dan Flynn of Canton, John Frullo of Lubbock, John Garza of San Antonio, Charlie Geren of Fort Worth, Larry Gonzales of Round Rock, Kelly Hancock of Fort Worth, Rick Hardcastle of Vernon, Patricia Harless of Spring, Linda HarperBrown of Irving, Will Hartnett of Dallas, Harvey Hilderbran of Kerrville, Charlie Howard of Sugar Land, Dan Huberty of Humble, Bryan Hughes of Marshall, Todd Hunter of Corpus Christi, Jason Isaac of Dripping Springs, Jim Jackson of Carrolton, Jim Keffer of Granbury, Phil King of Weatherford.

Also, Tim Kleinschmidt of Lexington, Lois Kolkhorst of Brenham, John Kuempel of Seguin, Lyle Larson of San Antonio, Jodie Laubenberg of Rockwall, George Lavender of Texarkana, Ken Legler of Pasadena, Lanham Lyne of Wichita Falls, Jerry Madden of Plano, Dee Margo of El Paso, Doug Miller of New Braunfels, Sid Miller of Stephenville, Geanie Morrison of Victoria, Jim Murphy of Houston, Barbara Nash of Arlington, Rob Orr of Burleson, John Otto of Dayton, Tan Parker of Flower Mound, Ken Paxton of McKinney.

And, Charles Perry of Lubbock, Four Price of Amarillo, Charles Schwertner of Georgetown, Connie Scott of Corpus Christi, Kenneth Sheets of Dallas, Ralph Sheffield of Temple, Mark Shelton of Fort Worth, David Simpson of Longview, Todd Smith of Bedford, Wayne Smith of Baytown, John Smithee of Amarillo, Burt Solomons of Carrolton, Larry Taylor of League City, Vicki Truitt of Southlake, Randy Weber of Pearland, Beverly Woolley of Houston, Paul Workman of Spicewood, Bill Zedler of Arlington, John Zerwas of Simonton.

If you are represented by a Republican in the Texas Senate, your senator also voted for Senate Bill 8 because the vote in that chamber was strictly party line.

A number of House Republicans voted against Senate Bill 8, but most of them, as well as most of the House members who voted for the antiteacher bill, also voted for the new state budget that cuts more than $5 billion from public school budgets.

Teachers have a lot of opportunities to work for political change, not only in the Legislature but also on local school boards, which now have been given much additional authority by Senate Bill 8 over teacher pay and working conditions.

Educators’ futures are largely in their own hands, and it’s time for them to rev up their political engines.

Back to the cutting board for Keller ISD

The Keller ISD is being squeezed between a rock and a hard place. The rock is rapid, suburban enrollment growth that has prompted the North Texas district to build 22 new schools since 2000. The hard place is the antitax sentiment of conservative politicians and voters who either think quality education grows on trees…or simply don’t care.

The district, which has been given an excellent efficiency rating by the state comptroller, already had cut more than 200 jobs, increased class sizes, reduced its number of athletic teams and taken other costcutting steps to save about $16 million, or about half of a revenue shortfall anticipated for the next two years.

School officials asked local voters to cover the other half with a 13 cents per $100 valuation increase in its local property tax rate, but local voters rejected the proposal last Saturday. Leading the antitax campaign were the antigovernment, Tea Partytypes whose support of the governor and legislative majority is largely to blame for the revenue shortfall the district is trying to bridge.

Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst also chimed in with a letter to the editor of the Fort Worth StarTelegram against the local tax proposal.

So, what now?

According to news reports, more Keller employees will lose their jobs, fine arts and music programs will be reduced, class sizes will increase for high school students and several thousand kids will lose regular bus service to school.

Maybe the Tea Party will volunteer to help out with car pools.

Elections have consequences.

http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/KellerISDPreparesforMoreCuts124217894.html

Teaching school or packing boxes?

Click on the link below to check out the latest corporate sweetheart idea for robbing the state treasury – and the public schools. According to this item in the Austin AmericanStatesman, state officials are negotiating a deal with Amazon.com to grant Amazon a four and onehalf year exemption from collecting sales taxes on online sales in exchange for the online giant’s promise to bring more than 5,000 jobs and $300 million in capital investments to Texas over the next three years. The language may become part of Senate Bill 1, a fiscal matters bill in a special session conference committee.

Let’s do some math.

Comptroller Susan Combs has estimated the state loses $600 million a year from untaxed online sales. Not all of that is from Amazon, but if Amazon gets some corporate welfare (that’s what this is), other online companies are going to have their hands out.

The same folks who are considering this deal – the governor and legislative leaders – have approved a new state budget that already cuts $4 billion from public school finance formulas and will leave the 2013 session of the Legislature with a multibilliondollar shortfall in school funding.

Instead of giving up another big chunk of money, the state should be clamping down on online sales. Some $600 million would pay the annual salaries of about 12,000 school teachers, many of whom have lost – or will soon lose – their jobs under the new state budget. (The 12,000 estimate is based on the average teacher salary in Texas of $48,000.)

Some of those teachers, I guess, could end up with jobs with Amazon, if the retailer delivers. And, maybe a few of those jobs would even be something more challenging – and financially rewarding – than taking orders and packing boxes.

Traditional retailers should be up in arms over this proposal.

This is the time for state government to be developing an adequate, broadbased tax structure, not eroding an inadequate tax base for pieinthesky economic development promises that may or may not ever be delivered.

http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/sharedgen/blogs/austin/politics/entries/2011/06/20/amazon_negoitiating_for_salest.html