Skip to contentSkip to left sidebar Skip to right sidebar Skip to footer

Grading Texas

Less means what it says

I know virtually nothing about Robert Nelsen, the president of the University of TexasPan American, but he understands math, particularly subtraction.

After listening to countless newspaper editors, corporate CEOs and governors blab about “doing more with less” during years of downsizing and budget cuts, it was almost refreshing to notice Nelsen pointing out the obvious – “less is less” in an article in the McAllen Monitor over the weekend.

The article, nevertheless, was a sad recitation of the program and job cuts in store for UTPan American and other campuses in the Rio Grande Valley, stemming from spending cuts ordered by state leaders in anticipation of next year’s $18 billion revenue shortfall.

According to a recent report, the supply of school teachers, nurses and civil engineers from UTPan American and the nearby University of TexasBrownsville already is failing to meet the Valley’s annual job openings. And that shortfall likely will worsen as Nelsen has all but ruled out curriculum expansion, including programs in the fastgrowing medical industry.

Thanks to deregulated tuition, UTPan American students will pay 4.9 percent more in tuition and fees this year, while the university suffers an anticipated reduction of $21.8 million in state funding.

“My biggest concern is in doing less, we have to make certain that we always keep the student at the forefront in every decision we make,” Nelsen told the newspaper. “It’s easy to not do that.”

And, it’s a lot easier, unfortunately, in Austin.

http://www.themonitor.com/articles/font40948stylespan.html

What environment?

State officials in Maryland, including Gov. Martin O’Malley, are promoting a proposal to make environmental education a requirement for high school graduation in that state, according to an article in Education Week. If the idea is adopted by the Maryland State Board of Education this fall, it apparently would be the first time a state has imposed a graduation requirement focused on environmental literacy.

The proposal wouldn’t require students to take a particular course but would ensure that environmental literacy is “threaded through” the curriculum.

I have difficulty imagining Texas following Maryland’s lead, and maybe we shouldn’t, at least not until we have a different State Board of Education to write our curriculum standards. As long as conservative ideologues keep driving the SBOE train here, I can easily imagine “environmental” curriculum standards such as the following:

# Global warming is a fairy tale.

# Cap and trade is the work of the Devil.

# Carpooling is a form of socialism.

# Rapid transit spreads disease.

# Every Texas family should drive at least two SUVs, and preferably three. Biggerthanlife people need biggerthanlife cars, and the busier our refineries, the healthier our economic environment.

# Water pollution is harmless because you can buy the bottled variety at the store.

# The BP oil spill was an act of God.

# And, BP CEO Tony Hayward was an environmental hero for sacrificing a large chunk of his life to help feed the nosy media’s morbid curiosity.

A Democratbashing SBOE candidate

Some education supporters may have breathed a little easier this spring when Marsha Farney of Georgetown, a former teacher and school counselor, defeated Brian Russell for the Republican nomination for the District 10 seat on the State Board of Education.

Russell clearly was a rightwinger, eager to join in the ideological mayhem that ultraconservative board members have been inflicting on the public schools for the past several years. He even had been endorsed by incumbent Cynthia Dunbar, who is stepping down from the board after being an outspoken leader of the rightwing pack.

Farney, however, remained something of a mystery, at least until recently. On her webpage, she promises to work for a strong curriculum and quality education, but that doesn’t tell us very much. She declined to respond to a candidate questionnaire from TSTA, which is supporting Democratic nominee Judy Jennings in the district, which stretches from north Austin to the Houston suburbs.

TSTA believes Jennings, a former employee of the Texas Education Agency and longtime worker in the education field, is a strong supporter of the public schools.

Now, teachers, parents and other Texas taxpayers who would like to see the State Board of Education work to improve the public schools rather than promote political viewpoints have even more reason to be leery of Farney.

According to an item in the Austin AmericanStatesman, now making the rounds of the blogosphere, Farney showed up at Tea Party rally on July 4, where she told the conservative crowd that she would rather be there “than with those Americabashing Democrats.”

Americabashing Democrats?

Sounds like the message Cynthia Dunbar and the other ultraconservatives on the SBOE have been dishing out for quite a while now. And, it sure sounds more ideological than educational.

http://blogs.chron.com/texaspolitics/archives/2010/07/americanbashing.html

Trying to clear the fog

Having returned to the real world from a few days’ worth of vacation in San Francisco – still chilly out there, still hilly, still beautiful I am still trying to clear out a bit of the fog. But only a cursory reading of the news clips is enough to find Gov. Perry still dancing around accountability on a number of fronts, including an outrageously dishonest method of inflating school ratings.

Meanwhile, yesterday’s release of a statewide poll by the Texas Freedom Network reaffirms what most of us already knew – the rightwingers on the State Board of Education are embalmed somewhere in a medieval fogbank.

TFN actually released the results from two questions on the survey several weeks ago, when the board was bringing national ridicule to Texas by injecting dubious conservative political opinions into social studies curriculum standards. One shows that 72 percent of likely Texas voters want educators – not the board – deciding what students should be taught. Sharing that view were 84 percent of Democrats, 63 percent of Republicans and 76 percent of independents.

The other major finding is that 68 percent of the respondents believe separation of church and state is a key legal principle. Remember all the efforts by conservative, selfanointed history “experts” to deny the existence of the separation of church and state? Obviously, most Texans – or at least those responding to the poll had history educations that were sounder than what the state board wants to provide today’s students.

Religion, however, is important to many Texans. Fortynine percent of respondents said religion should have more influence in public schools.

Public school teachers also should be particularly interested in another finding from the survey. Some 55 percent of the respondents oppose spending tax dollars on vouchers that would allow students to attend private and religious schools.

Other findings included:

# 80 percent of respondents agreed that high school sex education classes should teach “about contraception, such as condoms and other birth control, along with abstinence.”

# 88 percent thinks public schools should be required “to protect all children from bullying, harassment, and discrimination in school, including the children of gay and lesbian parents or teenagers who are gay.”

The survey of 972 likely voters was conducted May 412, shortly before the state board gave final approval to the new social studies curriculum standards.

http://www.tfn.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=1&page=NewsArticle&id=6317