Grading Texas

It’s more than a redistricting fight. It’s about the future of democracy and education.

Some people may wonder why the Texas State Teachers Association is siding with the Democratic legislators from Texas who fled the state in the fight over a congressional redistricting map. What does this have to do with education?

TSTA is backing the Democrats because this is more than just a matter of routinely redrawing political boundaries. It is an effort by the president of the United States to rig the 2026 midterm elections that will determine the future control of the U.S. House of Representatives and, in turn, the future of our democracy and the education system that is dependent on it.

Since inauguration day, both democracy and education have been under attack by President Trump, a me-first, autocratic leader who believes the Constitution doesn’t apply to him and who is aided and abetted by a lapdog, rubber-stamp congressional majority that refuses to exercise its constitutional role to rein him in. Members of that majority are a combination of Trump accomplices, political cowards and individuals who, in the pre-Trump era, wouldn’t have qualified to be Capitol tour guides, much less policymakers.

Some federal judges have tried to apply the brakes to Trump’s abuses – including deep cuts to public education and health care and excessive, sometimes illegal enforcement of immigration laws — but with limited success. His minions have lied to some judges and ignored others, while so far, the U.S. Supreme Court has mostly stayed out of the president’s way.

The current Republican majority in the U.S. House is narrow, 219-212, with four vacant seats. Three of the vacant seats were most recently held by Democrats, and one by a Republican. All these seats, including vacant ones, will be on November 2026 ballots in the various states.

These numbers plus Trump’s rising unfavorable ratings mean Republicans may lose their House majority. If they do, a new Democratic majority will gain control over the House’s oversight powers and use them to challenge and investigate the administration’s attacks on democracy and maybe impeach the president for the third time, all of which Trump fears.

So, to protect himself, he is trying to rig the election. He started by asking Texas Republicans to redraw the state’s congressional district lines to add five more Republicans to the U.S. House and increase the chances of the GOP keeping its majority. So, Gov. Greg Abbott – one of Trump’s Texas lapdogs – added congressional redistricting to the Legislature’s special session agenda.

When Republican leaders produced a new map that ignored voting rights protections for minority Texans and took five congressional seats from Democratic incumbents to create new districts favoring Republicans, more than 50 Democratic legislators left Texas to break a quorum and keep the House from passing the new redistricting bill before the special session adjourns Aug. 19.

Democrats may maintain their session boycott until then, but Abbott remains in control because he can keep calling special sessions of 30 days each, making it likely Democrats ultimately will return, and the Republican majority will pass the new redistricting bill.

With the Texas redistricting walkout receiving national attention, the fight is likely to continue in other states. If Trump gets his way in Texas, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom of California vows to pursue mid-decade redistricting to add five Democrats at the expense of five Republicans to his blue state’s congressional delegation, and governors of other Democratic states may follow suit. Meanwhile, urged on by Trump, other Republican states may follow Texas’ lead.

“It’s existential now,” U.S. Rep. Joe Morelle, D-N.Y., told the Axios news site. “I think there’s broad agreement by Democrats that…we simply can’t stand by and let the Republican Party completely ruin the map.”

Bare-knuckled partisanship isn’t pretty. Neither is Trump’s presidency, and the midterm elections are crucial.

Clay Robison

Is Trump ending federal enforcement of school desegregation?

President Trump has gone out of his way to endorse racism and other forms of bigotry with high profile immigration raids and detentions as well as his efforts to destroy diversity, equity and inclusion programs in higher and public education and the corporate world.

Now, it looks like an end to desegregation enforcement in public education could be next.

The Guardian news site recently reported that the Trump Justice Department was ending a consent decree in a Plaquemines Parish, La., school district that has been under a desegregation order since the Johnson administration in the 1960s.

According to The Guardian, the Justice Department still has about 135 desegregation cases on its docket, most of which are in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia. Many of these cases date back to the1960s’ civil rights era when President Johnson and the federal courts were clamping down on school districts trying to find ways to circumvent the Supreme Court’s landmark Brown vs. Board of Education desegregation order.

Now, the Trump administration is suggesting those old cases are obsolete, and court-approved enforcement orders are no longer necessary. The Louisiana school district did not have to prove it was still complying with the old consent decree. Instead, the Justice Department simply worked with the Louisiana state attorney general’s office to agree on the dismissal.

Johnathan Smith, chief of staff and general counsel for the National Center for Youth Law, said the decision “signals utter contempt for communities of color by the administration and a lack of awareness of the history of segregation that has plagued our nation’s schools.”

“Even though we are 71 years after the Brown vs. Board (of Education) decision, schools of this country remain more segregated today than they were back in 1954,” Smith added. “The fact that the administration is kind of wholeheartedly ending these types of consent decrees is troubling, particularly when they’re not doing the research and investigation to determine whether or not these decrees really should be ended at this point.”

The years following the Supreme Court’s desegregation order also marked the introduction of private school vouchers, which were used by segregationists to pay the way for white students to attend so-called segregation academies, which eventually were outlawed by federal courts.

Interestingly, vouchers are surging now. Yielding to the demands of Gov. Greg Abbott, the Legislature enacted Texas’ first voucher bill this year, and at the urging of U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, the first federal voucher program was included in Trump’s budget bill recently enacted by Congress.

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department’s civil rights division said the dismissal of the consent decree in the Louisiana case was part of “getting America refocused on our bright future.”

It sounds more like another significant step toward returning our country to its dark, racist past.

Consent decrees force schools to desegregate. The Trump administration is striking them down.

Clay Robison

Even with an extra $8.5 billion for public schools, Texas still trails the national average in per-student funding by $4,000

Seeking to wring as much favorable publicity as he could over signing an $8.5 billion (but still inadequate) increase in state funding for public schools, Gov. Greg Abbott claimed the new measure, House Bill 2, “ensures that our schools are funded better than ever.”

Sure, $8.5 billion is a huge figure, and it is a good step in the right direction. But what really matters is how much $8.5 billion translates into additional funding for each of Texas’ 5 million or so students. Do the math, and you will find that it is about an extra $1,700 per student for the next two years. That also sounds impressive, but it still leaves Texas’ per pupil spending in average daily attendance (ADA) about $4,000 less than the national average for the just completed 2024-25 school year.

There was a lot of talk during the legislative session about schools needing a funding boost of as much as $1,300 per student to recover from inflationary losses suffered since the last meaningful increase in public education funding in 2019. But the boost in school funding in 2019 still left per-student funding in Texas several thousand dollars less than the national average then. This is because of the state’s record, especially in recent years, of doing such an inadequate job of funding schools. Inflation just made the shortage worse. The total appropriations for education may be huge, but the needs of the second largest student enrollment in the country are great and growing.

In its most recent annual ranking of each state’s financial commitment to public education, the National Education Association, using data from the Texas Education Agency, calculated that Texas spent an average of $13,189 per student in ADA during 2024-25. This was $5,664 less than the national average of $18,853 and ranked Texas 47th among the states, almost scraping the bottom. Only Idaho, Oklahoma and Utah spent less per child.

Add $1,700 to $13,189, and Texas would be spending $14,889 per student, still about $4,000 less than this year’s national average and theoretically rank us 39th. But by the time the additional House Bill 2 funding is spread over the next two years, other states will have increased their per-pupil spending as well, and the national average and Texas’ deficit will be more.

What is so important about the national average? Well, it is the closest thing we have to a national standard for education spending. And being so far behind the national standard on key benchmarks is a strong indication that Texas, the second most-populous state, isn’t trying hard enough.

Had lawmakers, for example, not given Abbott his top education priority – the $1 billion voucher bill for private schools — and added that money to House Bill 2 instead, it would have increased per-student funding for public schools by another $200. Now, voucher advocates will come back for more tax funding at the expense of public schools every time the Legislature meets.

Some provisions in the new school finance bill – including teacher pay raises, changes in special education funding and incentives to increase the number of certified teachers – are good, but Texas schools are still underfunded. At present, the average teacher pay in Texas is more than $10,400 less than the national average, and the raises in House Bill 2 won’t close that gap either.

At his bill signing ceremony, Abbott spoke of making Texas “number one” in education, a goal that, for starters, will require a new governor or an overhaul of Abbott’s political priorities. And whoever the governor is, it will require substantial increases in public school funding every budget period for the foreseeable future, not just once every six years.

Clay Robison

Patrick once boycotted a Muslim prayer, now he chairs the Religious Liberty Commission

You probably have heard by now that President Trump has created a Religious Liberty Commission and appointed Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick to chair it. Trump said Patrick gave him the idea for the panel, which will study, among other things, the issue of “permitting time for voluntary prayer and religious instruction at public schools.” Sound familiar?

The commission also is charged with reporting on programs “to increase awareness of and celebrate America’s peaceful religious pluralism.”

Although phrases like “religious liberty” and “religious pluralism” may sound like equal treatment for all religions, don’t be so sure that is what Trump and Patrick have in mind, even though Patrick, at a White House ceremony announcing the commission, praised the president for “restoring the hopes and prayers of millions upon millions of believers of all faiths.”

Patrick has repeatedly made it clear that he believes, contrary to the historical record, that the United States was founded as a “Christian nation” and is doing all he can to promote the Christian nationalism movement by forcing Christian teachings and influence into Texas public schools.

He supported the State Board of Education’s approval of the Bible-infused curriculum now being offered to school districts for kindergarten through fifth grade. His legislative priorities this year include bills allowing prayer in public schools and posting copies of the Ten Commandments in every public school classroom. And, of course, he was a driving force behind the new voucher law that will give families tax-paid vouchers to send their children to religious schools, most of which in Texas are Christian.

Patrick denies the separation of church and state principle, which for years guided public schools in Texas. Contrary to the claims of Patrick and other right-wing revisionists of history, our country’s founders established a government that was supposed to stay out of religion, leaving people to worship any religion or no religion and be able to send their children to schools that didn’t promote one religion over another.

Although Patrick and Trump both loudly promote the Christian label, both also promote public policies that ignore many of Christ’s teachings about caring for the sick and the poor and offering a helping hand to strangers, not dictator-style deportation. But obviously hypocrisy is at worst a very minor sin in MAGA Land.

Rachel Laser, president and CEO of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said the new Trump/Patrick commission was “not about religious liberty, but about advancing Christian nationalism.”

“True religious freedom requires equality among religions and between religion and nonreligion in the eyes of the law and at every level of our government,” Laser added. “Trump clearly designed this commission to favor conservative Christians, especially those who want to use the power of our government to impose their religion on others.”

You probably have noticed that Patrick isn’t promoting legislation to have passages from the Koran posted in Texas classrooms.

Patrick was a first-year state senator in 2007, when the Texas Senate for the first time had a Muslim cleric deliver the day’s opening prayer. I was there for the historic occasion, in my previous life as a newspaper reporter, but Patrick wasn’t. He boycotted the prayer.

After returning to the Senate chamber later, Patrick delivered a speech praising religious tolerance and freedom of speech.

“I think that it’s important that we are tolerant as a people of all faiths, but that doesn’t mean we have to endorse all faiths, and that was my decision,” he said. “I surely believe that everyone should have the right to speak, but I didn’t want my attendance on the floor to appear that I was endorsing that.”

Yes, actions often speak louder than words. At least they did that day.

Trump’s executive order.

Patrick boycotts Senate’s first Muslim prayer.

Clay Robison